Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FATES doesn't work in branch runs #1271

Open
samsrabin opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

FATES doesn't work in branch runs #1271

samsrabin opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@samsrabin
Copy link
Contributor

When trying to use FATES as part of a branch run, I get the following error:

forrtl: severe (151): allocatable array is already allocated
Image              PC                Routine            Line        Source
cesm.exe           0000000000983A08  edinitmod_mp_init         144  EDInitMod.F90
cesm.exe           00000000006403F4  clmfatesinterface        2089  clmfates_interfaceMod.F90
cesm.exe           00000000006063A6  clm_initializemod         757  clm_initializeMod.F90
cesm.exe           00000000005A8EA3  lnd_comp_nuopc_mp         658  lnd_comp_nuopc.F90

This is with CTSM tag ctsm5.3.009, FATES tag sci.1.78.3_api.36.1.0. It can be reproduced using the test ERI_Ld60.f45_f45_mg37.I2000Clm50FatesCruRsGs.derecho_intel.clm-Fates, which is the ERI version of an ERS test we already run as part of the fates suite.

@jennykowalcz
Copy link

Have also encountered this. The less strict hybrid mode does work though.

@XiulinGao
Copy link
Contributor

I did encounter a similar issue when run with FATES API 36 (CTSM 5.2.013). If I want to do a hybrid run using restart file model build will fail warning that a restart file should not be defined when cold start is turned on. But I did turn it off.

@samsrabin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@XiulinGao That's actually a separate issue that is now fixed in CTSM as of ctsm5.3.011.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: ❕Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants