We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
closing issue #616 as much of that was resolved.
We decided to update nutrient dynamics parameters at a later date, copying in comment by @jenniferholm:
@rgknox - The vcmax_np1, vcmax_np2, vcmax_np3, vcmax_np4 parameters are from Walker et al. 2014, and used in the ECA code, and vary by PFT. Each one has the same descriptor of: "vcmax~np relationship coefficient") == Here are the values I found from an ELM parameter file, but I'm not sure if these are the up-to-date values. Here is the parameter file name: clm_params.c170414_defNUP_isvc_defmort_arctichvcmax_defNFIX_defPHTASE.nc double vcmax_np1(pft) ; vcmax_np1:long_name = "vcmaxnp relationship coefficient" ; vcmax_np1:unit = "" ; double vcmax_np2(pft) ; vcmax_np2:long_name = "vcmaxnp relationship coefficient" ; vcmax_np2:unit = "" ; double vcmax_np3(pft) ; vcmax_np3:long_name = "vcmaxnp relationship coefficient" ; vcmax_np3:unit = "" ; double vcmax_np4(pft) ; vcmax_np4:long_name = "vcmaxnp relationship coefficient" ; vcmax_np4:unit = "" ; vcmax_np1 = 3.934375, 4.18625, 2.2828125, 4.8, 4.02421875, 3.878125, 4.8, 4.7175, 3.9421875, 3.7, 3.7859375, 3.73046875, 4.0046875, 3.7859375, 4.43859375, 3.7859375, 3.7390625, 3.7390625, 3.7390625, 3.7390625, 3.7390625, 3.7390625, 3.7390625, 3.7390625, 3.7390625 ; vcmax_np2 = 0.65625, 0.7125, 0.853125, 0.7453125, 0.7640625, 0.9140625, 0.8015625, 0.91875, 1.096875, 0.6, 1.134375, 0.8390625, 0.646875, 1.134375, 0.6703125, 1.134375, 0.740625, 0.740625, 0.740625, 0.740625, 0.740625, 0.740625, 0.740625, 0.740625, 0.740625 ; vcmax_np3 = 0.175, 0.09, 0.0775, 0.08625, 0.07125, 0.19125, 0.12125, 0.185, 0.1225, 0.04, 0.1725, 0.17125, 0.0825, 0.1725, 0.14625, 0.1725, 0.1675, 0.1675, 0.1675, 0.1675, 0.1675, 0.1675, 0.1675, 0.1675, 0.1675 ; vcmax_np4 = 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282, 0.282 ;
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
this is continuing via #799, closing
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
closing issue #616 as much of that was resolved.
We decided to update nutrient dynamics parameters at a later date, copying in comment by @jenniferholm:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: