You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
13 species are included in the Nature Index database but are not part of the species selection for the TRIM analyses here.
We need to check why that is (some may be indicators based on expert opinion alone) and to what degree they need including here.
These are the affected species:
"Acrocephalus schoenobaenus"
"Anthus cervinus"
"Anthus petrosus"
"Aythya marila"
"Calidris alpina"
"Charadrius morinellus"
"Cinclus cinclus"
"Clangula hyemalis"
"Eremophila alpestris"
"Gallinago media"
"Melanitta fusca"
"Melanitta nigra"
"Phalaropus lobatus"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@DiegoPavonJordan Bård has confirmed that these are the species for which we need expert assessments. But he also said it could be useful if we ran the TRIM analyses on them. So we should add those to the list of species for analysis (alongside the grouse species and the area-subsetted species).
13 species are included in the Nature Index database but are not part of the species selection for the TRIM analyses here.
We need to check why that is (some may be indicators based on expert opinion alone) and to what degree they need including here.
These are the affected species:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: