You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
however, later we found out that there is no "perturbative-exact" solution for QED, but only the iterated one - see QED paper
Question: do we want to change ev_op_max_order back to just an integer? @tgiani@giacomomagni
This would be of course a breaking change (and thus directly related to #417) and to make it even more explicit we could also rename it to ev_op_max_order_qcd
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ev_op_max_order
has become a tuple(QCD, QED)
, because we thought we needed itev_op_max_order
is the maximum perturbative order in which we expand theQuestion: do we want to change
ev_op_max_order
back to just an integer? @tgiani @giacomomagniThis would be of course a breaking change (and thus directly related to #417) and to make it even more explicit we could also rename it to
ev_op_max_order_qcd
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: