Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pineko doesn't respect _template.yaml #105

Closed
scarlehoff opened this issue Jul 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Pineko doesn't respect _template.yaml #105

scarlehoff opened this issue Jul 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member

I've noticed pineko doesn't respect all options in _template.yaml. I've noticed with n_integration_cores which gets filled as 0 regardless of what I put in the template.

This is with a fresh installation of pineline[full].

I've noticed this one because my computer crashed after eko took every possible resource, but it might be other options that are not respected. I'll have a look whether there's something else (relevant for physics) being ignored or whether it is a problem of the pineline package in pypi.

@felixhekhorn felixhekhorn added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 10, 2023
@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor

just to exclude a trivial bug: are you editing the correct file? Recall that after #67 the _template.yaml is theory dependent ... I didn't run myself, but looking here

operators_card = copy.deepcopy(default_card)
this looks reasonable

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member Author

Could be, I have a mess of theories and symbolic links. I sed'ed everything and worked. I'll have a proper look and either close or fix this.

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, it was that. Thanks. I've also put a more reasonable value in the two theories that are there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants