Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to deal with jets #16

Closed
felixhekhorn opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

How to deal with jets #16

felixhekhorn opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 7 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request refactor Refactor code

Comments

@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

For future reference: a bin-by-bin-evolution (as needed for jets) is still possible if needed after NNPDF/eko#105 , but this time I would rather hack outside pineko then inside: we could define a bunch of fake-datasets: CMS_1JET_8TEV-bin00000 containing exactly one member which itself contains exactly one bin /cc @cschwan

Originally posted by @felixhekhorn in #12 (comment)

@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

@felixhekhorn would it make sense to support this as a 'mode' in Pineko? It would exactly do what you descibe: 1) chop the grid into single bins, 2) evolve each bin and finally 3) merge all evolved bins together again.

Originally posted by @cschwan in #12 (comment)

@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mmm I'd rather prefer to not have this inside the "core pineko" as this is too much of a special case; still we could bind the "hacks" to the repo as a special command: pineko jets SUBCOMMAND ...

@alecandido
Copy link
Member

Maybe pineko split sounds a bit less custom than pineko jets, but once NNPDF/eko#105 (and the subsequent companion PR) will be available, the split will be there out of the box.

@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe pineko split sounds a bit less custom than pineko jets,

agreed

but once N3PDF/eko#105 (and the subsequent companion PR) will be available, the split will be there out of the box.

not for eko, but maybe still for pineappl - or maybe we find around also another way there ...

@alecandido
Copy link
Member

Ok, that's correct

@felixhekhorn felixhekhorn added enhancement New feature or request refactor Refactor code labels Jul 12, 2022
@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

solved with eko v0.13.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request refactor Refactor code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants