You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Compare with a cache of APFEL's results, if available
Split observables
Make a separate test for each observable: F2light, FLlight, F2charm, ...
Order by order
When introducing a new perturbative order the contribution of the new order should be compared with the correspondent from APFEL, instead of the full object.
Maybe the two things should be combined (if the correction is too irrelevant maybe it should not have to be too accurate)
Relative - absolute error
Probably no one of the two things make sense on its own, so maybe if the relative error is big enough also the absolute one should be checked against something else (what?), if it is too small maybe it's not really an error.
Candidates
average over xs, Q2s
some relevant standard point
proposals?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Cache
Compare with a cache of APFEL's results, if available
Split observables
Make a separate test for each observable:
F2light
,FLlight
,F2charm
, ...Order by order
When introducing a new perturbative order the contribution of the new order should be compared with the correspondent from APFEL, instead of the full object.
Maybe the two things should be combined (if the correction is too irrelevant maybe it should not have to be too accurate)
Relative - absolute error
Probably no one of the two things make sense on its own, so maybe if the relative error is big enough also the absolute one should be checked against something else (what?), if it is too small maybe it's not really an error.
Candidates
x
s,Q2
sThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: