We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
At the moment the theory runcard is defining three kinds of heavy quark masses:
mc
Qmc
kcthr
kcthr * mc
For yadism they all coincide currently, because:
yadism
POLE
Let's fix at least the second, and we will deal with the first as soon as HQMS will be implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
part one is done in NNPDF/eko#62, the difference between pole mass and MSbar mass is discussed in #84
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
At the moment the theory runcard is defining three kinds of heavy quark masses:
mc
: the mass of the charm (e.g.)Qmc
: the reference scale at whichmc
is evaluated as a Lagrangian parameter in a renormalization scheme (say MSbar)kcthr
: so the actual new mass is given bykcthr * mc
, and it is the threshold used by any VFNS for charmFor
yadism
they all coincide currently, because:POLE
are not implemented (soQmc
is irrelevant)kcthr
is always considered oneLet's fix at least the second, and we will deal with the first as soon as HQMS will be implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: