You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A recent update to the SMC grid to allow for wetting an drying (#1192) changed the behaviour of the cell depths with respect to the VSC depth scaling value.
This is impacting the results of one of the regression tests (ww3_tp2.10) as described here: #1230 (comment)
Excerpt below:
This recent SMC grid update has activated an old conversion factor VSC to reverse the depth values stored in the SMC grid cell array before they are assigned to the WW3 ZB variable:
!/SMC !Li Minimum DMIN depth is used as well for SMC.
!/SMC !! ZB(ISEA)= - MAX( DMIN, FLOAT( IJKCel(5, ISEA) ) )
!/SMC !Li Allow land cell to be defined by ZLIM value and only reset
!/SMC !Li MAPST* land values for sea points. JGLi03Nov2023
!/SMC ZB(ISEA)= DVSMC*FLOAT( IJKCel(5, ISEA) )
The DVSMC is a copy of the VSC conversion factor, which is specified in the w3_grid.inp file on the old depth input file line:
-0.1 10.0 30 -1. 1 1 '(....)' 'NAME' 'S36125Depth.dat'
Where the fourth argument -1.(0) Is for the VSC. This factor is not defined in the namelist input file and it results in all wet points are converted into land points. The namelist input file in tp2.10 test needs to be updated for this factor. If the old ww3_grid.inp file is used, it should be fine.
From: Mickael Accensi @.>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2024 8:17 AM
To: NOAA-EMC/WW3 @.>
Cc: JianGuo Li @.>; Mention @.>
Subject: Re: [NOAA-EMC/WW3] Add option to use NetCDF output instead of binary for point output (PR #1230)
This affects both ww3_tp2.10 and ww3_tp2.16 , but only when using the NML input file. The default value for DEPTH%SF=1.0 but the input files for those regtests require DEPTH%SF=-1.0
Running with INP files is not affected as the SF parameter is mandatory.
A recent update to the SMC grid to allow for wetting an drying (#1192) changed the behaviour of the cell depths with respect to the
VSC
depth scaling value.This is impacting the results of one of the regression tests (ww3_tp2.10) as described here:
#1230 (comment)
Excerpt below:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: