We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
User file fails debug assert here on line 167.
EnergyPlus/src/EnergyPlus/DataSurfaces.cc
Lines 160 to 172 in 9c7c2a6
On this surface:
BuildingSurface:Detailed, Surface 224, !- Name Floor, !- Surface Type INT-FLOOR-TOPSIDE, !- Construction Name Thermal Zone: Space 1001,!- Zone Name , !- Space Name Adiabatic, !- Outside Boundary Condition Surface 223, !- Outside Boundary Condition Object NoSun, !- Sun Exposure NoWind, !- Wind Exposure , !- View Factor to Ground 4, !- Number of Vertices 4.40088749474129,4.35091266558963,0, !- X,Y,Z ==> Vertex 1 {m} 31.1368348989344,-24.4473381871601,0, !- X,Y,Z ==> Vertex 2 {m} 26.4975013986653,-29.0874436400291,0, !- X,Y,Z ==> Vertex 3 {m} 32.5936992035615,-35.8668490379663,0; !- X,Y,Z ==> Vertex 4 {m}
Which looks like this:
Shouldn't this be a fatal surface error?
Some additional details for this issue (if relevant):
Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would think the original intent was that this check is expensive-ish, and shouldn't penalize everyone?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Issue overview
User file fails debug assert here on line 167.
EnergyPlus/src/EnergyPlus/DataSurfaces.cc
Lines 160 to 172 in 9c7c2a6
On this surface:
Which looks like this:
Shouldn't this be a fatal surface error?
Details
Some additional details for this issue (if relevant):
Checklist
Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: