Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inside Movable Insulation causing increased heat loss #10865

Open
1 of 3 tasks
mjwitte opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Inside Movable Insulation causing increased heat loss #10865

mjwitte opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mjwitte
Copy link
Contributor

mjwitte commented Dec 19, 2024

Issue overview

User test file shows that inside movable insulation results are nowhere near equivalent results with the insulation layer included in the base construction. In fact, the heating load increases significantly with the inside movable insulation. Outside movable insulation results are reasonably close to the equivalent construction.

Test file results (run with USA_CO_Denver-Stapleton.724690_TMY.epw):

Filename Insulation Location Method District Heat District Cool % diff MI vs Constr, Heating Cooling
MovableIntInsulationLights-NoInsulation None 28033 10345
MovableIntInsulationLights-Outside-Construction Outside Construction 14983 5836
MovableIntInsulationLights-Outside-MovIns Outside MI 14516 6040 -3% +3.5%
MovableIntInsulationLights-Inside-Construction Inside Construction 14263 6577
MovableIntInsulationLights-Inside-MovIns Inside MI 33583 10303 +135% +57%

Note that the inside movable insulation case has a significantly higher heating load than the base case with no insulation.

Details

Some additional details for this issue (if relevant):

Checklist

Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.

  • Defect file added EnergyPlusDevSupport\DefectFiles
  • Ticket added to EnergyPlus Defect Complexity (Github Project)
  • Pull request created (the pull request will have additional tasks related to reviewing changes that fix this defect)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant