Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Material:RoofVegetation with anything other than CTF should be fatal. #10871

Open
1 of 3 tasks
mjwitte opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Material:RoofVegetation with anything other than CTF should be fatal. #10871

mjwitte opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mjwitte
Copy link
Contributor

mjwitte commented Dec 20, 2024

Issue overview

A user file with Material:Roofvegetation and HeatBalanceAlgorithm ConductionFiniteDifference results in unrealistic roof surface temperatures.

Looking at output variable BLOCK1:ZONE1_ROOF_1_0_0:CondFD Surface Temperature Node 1 [C](Hourly), with v9.4 it shows very high temperatures (>300C), and with v25.1-9c7c2a6d79, that node reports 0C all year.

There is a severe error message, but this should terminate the simulation since it produces garbage results.
** Severe ** CalcEcoRoof: EcoRoof simulation but HeatBalanceAlgorithm is not ConductionTransferFunction(CTF). EcoRoof model currently works only with CTF heat balance solution algorithm.

  1. Fatal out for this condition.
  2. Make sure this works ok if the file uses SurfaceProperty:HeatTransferAlgorithm or SurfaceProperty:HeatTransferAlgorithm:MultipleSurface.

Details

Some additional details for this issue (if relevant):

  • Version of EnergyPlus 25.1-9c7c2a6d79
  • Helpdesk ticket number 16816.

Checklist

Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.

  • Defect file added EnergyPlusDevSupport\DefectFiles
  • Ticket added to EnergyPlus Defect Complexity (Github Project)
  • Pull request created (the pull request will have additional tasks related to reviewing changes that fix this defect)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant