We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The latest PVSCM model says distributed PV should be $3.15/W, but the default in SAM is $4.07/W. The error appears to be that the PV+Battery developer overhead cost was applied to the models without batteries. See https://github.com/NREL/SAM-documentation/blob/main/Defaults%20References%20and%20Tools/Fall%202024/PVSCM%202024_resi.xlsm for details
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Default costs should align with latest benchmark
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
brtietz
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Describe the bug
The latest PVSCM model says distributed PV should be $3.15/W, but the default in SAM is $4.07/W. The error appears to be that the PV+Battery developer overhead cost was applied to the models without batteries. See https://github.com/NREL/SAM-documentation/blob/main/Defaults%20References%20and%20Tools/Fall%202024/PVSCM%202024_resi.xlsm for details
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
Default costs should align with latest benchmark
Operating System and Version
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: