Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[TASK] Use merge sort for nested types when cudf supports it #2252

Open
revans2 opened this issue Apr 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[TASK] Use merge sort for nested types when cudf supports it #2252

revans2 opened this issue Apr 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@firestarman
Labels
cudf_dependency An issue or PR with this label depends on a new feature in cudf task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing

Comments

@revans2
Copy link
Collaborator

revans2 commented Apr 23, 2021

When rapidsai/cudf#8050 is done we should remove all of the work that was done in #2251 to work around the lack of cudf support.
@revans2 revans2 added ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing labels Apr 23, 2021
@revans2 revans2 mentioned this issue Apr 23, 2021
Merged
@sameerz sameerz added cudf_dependency An issue or PR with this label depends on a new feature in cudf and removed ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify labels Apr 27, 2021
@revans2 revans2 mentioned this issue May 5, 2021
Closed
@firestarman
Copy link
Collaborator

Reopen the issue #8050 since cudf::merge is still missing the array and map type support.

@firestarman firestarman mentioned this issue Jan 5, 2022
Merged
@ttnghia ttnghia mentioned this issue Jun 12, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@firestarman firestarman

Labels
cudf_dependency An issue or PR with this label depends on a new feature in cudf task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@revans2 @sameerz @firestarman