Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support OpenRefine Reconciliation Service API #23

Open
osma opened this issue Jul 8, 2014 · 3 comments
Open

Support OpenRefine Reconciliation Service API #23

osma opened this issue Jul 8, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@osma
Copy link
Member

osma commented Jul 8, 2014

A way of performing batch searches for indexed databases would be useful. A standard way of doing that, with tool support (OpenRefine at least), would be to provide a Reconciliation Service API: https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/wiki/Reconciliation-Service-API

It should be decided whether this is a separate API (with a different URL base, e.g. /reconcile) or part of the REST API (just some new methods).

@osma
Copy link
Member Author

osma commented Aug 12, 2014

Could use Lucene fuzzy searches (e.g. "kissa~") to find non-exact matches.

@osma osma added this to the Blue Sky milestone Sep 9, 2014
@osma osma added the size-large more than 2 days label Oct 23, 2014
@tombaker
Copy link

@Webnet @osma @woody544 The USDA National Agricultural Library (NAL) uses Skosmos and Annif, and having Skosmos or Annif serve as a OpenRefine reconciliation API would be very helpful.

Our use case is reconciliation of local CSV files to NALT.

Currently we are using a relative old but workable JAR file that creates a reconciliation interface for the local CSV. After some digging we have found no more up-to-date alternatives. There is a Python module that seemingly does the same thing, but we could not get it to run properly.

@tombaker
Copy link

See also NatLibFi/Annif#338 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants