Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set version to 0.48.0 #1973

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024
Merged

Set version to 0.48.0 #1973

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

lgoettgens
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@thofma thofma enabled auto-merge (squash) December 13, 2024 09:47
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.96%. Comparing base (a67724b) to head (296a6ec).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1973   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.95%   87.96%           
=======================================
  Files          98       98           
  Lines       36450    36450           
=======================================
+ Hits        32061    32062    +1     
+ Misses       4389     4388    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@thofma thofma merged commit 16fa2cf into Nemocas:master Dec 13, 2024
24 checks passed
@lgoettgens lgoettgens deleted the lg/bump-0.48 branch December 13, 2024 10:01
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link

What's the breaking change with this version?

@lgoettgens
Copy link
Collaborator Author

What's the breaking change with this version?

Please see the recently merged PRs with breaking label in https://github.com/Nemocas/AbstractAlgebra.jl/issues?q=sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Abreaking and https://github.com/Nemocas/Nemo.jl/issues?q=sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Abreaking+is%3Aclosed
Most things from the list are only technically breaking and we expect no changes needed downstream. The only thing you would need to check for is #1935, everything else should be fine if your CI succeeds

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants