Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For which kind of image sizes is this suitable? #2

Open
Santana18 opened this issue May 6, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

For which kind of image sizes is this suitable? #2

Santana18 opened this issue May 6, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@Santana18
Copy link

Santana18 commented May 6, 2018

Are modifications necessary for larger camera images? Does your code expect any multiples of image sizes?

The network worked well for you, according to the paper content?

Thanks for your implementation and the good readme.

@Newcomer520
Copy link
Owner

Hello,
Thanks for your interesting of this repository. In my experiments I took sizes of (128, 128) and (64, 64) for the input. The configuration could be customized for the specific image size and filters of the autoencoder. I used the basic autoencoder(the auther did as well) to do the anomaly detection and it looks like good for my case. However, the encoded vectors seem to contribute less to the anomaly detection. In other words, I found the key factor is still the reconstruction error in my cases. The estimated GMM did help to predict the distribution, therefore having a robust result of anomaly detection.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants