Missing "id" in 2.0 schema

[tlivings]

Is this intentional? What URI should this be registered as, in, for example, schema validators.

[webron]

Are you referring to the "id" in the model/schema definitions? If so, it is indeed intentional. There's no need for it because the key for the definition is the id.

[tlivings]

Was actually referring to the top level id attribute of the schema itself.

[webron]

In that case, I don't follow. Can you give a concrete example of what you're referring to?

[tlivings]

https://github.com/wordnik/swagger-spec/blob/master/schemas/v1.2/apiDeclaration.json#L2

[tlivings]

Just to add something here. id can be used in resolving $ref, as per the spec, here:

http://json-schema.org/latest/json-schema-core.html#anchor26

JSON Schema offers facilities to alter the base URI against which a reference must resolve by the means of the "id" keyword;

[edit] Specifically: http://json-schema.org/latest/json-schema-core.html#anchor28

Containing an id property in this schema, as well as any referenced schema, is generally a good way to inform validators how to look up $ref.

[webron]

Yeah, didn't forget about it, just trying to figure out what would be the right id to give it. I hope to host it under our new swagger.io domain name and that should solve it.

[tlivings]

Thanks :) I just wanted to add more detail.

[webron]

That's great, I appreciate it. Always looking to learn more :)