You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In "RxNorm Extension" the concept_name is cut if it's longer than 255 chars (according to concept table DDL). The full original name is not added to the concept_synomym table as opposed to the "RxNorm" implementation where they're added as synonyms.
I don't know if the logic wasn't added by design or didn't work out for a portion of concepts - it requires further investigation. A quick guess is that the buildRxE function doesn't contribute to the concept_synomym table at all.
The expectation is to add original long names as synonyms. Otherwise, the semantics of the concept could be only deciphered using the attributive links that could be deprecated, and, therefore, not consistent over time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In "RxNorm Extension" the concept_name is cut if it's longer than 255 chars (according to concept table DDL). The full original name is not added to the concept_synomym table as opposed to the "RxNorm" implementation where they're added as synonyms.
RxNorm Extension example:
RxNorm example:
I don't know if the logic wasn't added by design or didn't work out for a portion of concepts - it requires further investigation. A quick guess is that the buildRxE function doesn't contribute to the concept_synomym table at all.
The expectation is to add original long names as synonyms. Otherwise, the semantics of the concept could be only deciphered using the attributive links that could be deprecated, and, therefore, not consistent over time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: