-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Buyer definition does not cater for post award needs #279
Comments
As additional information: Definitions used by Peppol:
Definitions used by UBL:
|
Regulation (EU) 2019/1780 defines a Buyer as follows: Contracting authority, contracting entity, a defence contractor, an international organisation, or an organisation awarding a contract subsidized by a contracting authority. |
This part of the buyer definition comes quite directly from Art. 13 of Directive 2014/24/EU. Concerning the general point on "awarding a contract" vs. "purchasing the object of the procurement", the procurement Directives speak mainly about public contracts, so eForms approach things similarly. |
Thank you for this clarification it would seem that rather than being a definition of what a buyer is the list:
provides the examples of buyers within the procurement directives (see limited examples above). |
Well, within the procurement directives (/eForms), it is an exhaustive list rather than examples. Defining a concept through such a list has the advantage of being able to rely on concepts that are defined elsewhere (often in huge detail, e.g. there is a ton of case-law on what a contracting authority is and isn't). The fact that some things are excluded from being a buyer is a feature in this sense, not a bug - eForms sees things the same way as the Directives. Whether this fits for the ontology depends on the ontology's users / use cases I guess, but assuming that the ontology needs to be alinged with eForms, then I'd think there wouldn't be much scope for narrowing nor expanding the definition. What are the organizations that you'd like to be covered by buyer, but they are not? For example, most organizations buying on the basis of an already awarded contract will still be contracting authorities, so they should be within the definition's scope. |
As of ePO version 3.0.1, the definition for A role of an agent that awards a contract and/or purchases items. Additional information: |
In a post award context, the Buyer will purchase on basis of an already awarded contract. The definition should mention this alternative
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: