-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RPTRST switch FLOWS #16
Comments
|
My question is how are these data structured in the output file. While we have a face/connection (if we include NNCs) ordering, it would not be the same as that used by i.e. Eclipse. Are these data structured in a logical cartesian manner for example? |
I don't know; but by staring at a file generated by Eclipse we might be able to infer it? I we have the source to the |
IORSim is closed source (correct?). However since it is made by the IOR center we should be able to discuss this with the authors. |
I'm not sure about the open- or closedness of IORSim. But there is room for discussion next week at the IOR conference. For now I have no idea how the data is organized. But I'll double check. |
For flow diagnostics purposes we also need FLOWRES (giving interblock reservoir volume flows), just adding it to this issue as a future reminder. |
Hello,
or
or
I already saw that |
There has been some effort related to this (although not finished), see the discussion in OPM/opm-simulators#1039. |
Within the IOR Centre there is the desire to couple OPM with IORSim through restart files (as a first step). IORSim relies on the output of inter block flow fields. The output of these values is done by the switch FLOWS as part of the RPTRST keyword.
What is the best way to add this functionality? The flow fields are obviously available in OPM and the output of face values should also be available.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: