You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm anonymising long interview videos and so the time is limiting.
To improve this could you just use tracking, like is used in other object detection situations where you perform detection periodically and then tracking in the intermediate frames.
This should help in a couple of different ways:
it will make it more robust to occlusion where detection might fail
it will significantly improve performance, only performing detection every nth frame and tracking between these will really help.
it will help quite a bit with the detection jitter for the bounding boxes/blurred areas that it currently has.
Other optimisations Number of expected faces:
could include a parameter for the number of faces in the image. If you're just expecting 2-3 then as long as the track is good on those then you can have less frequent detection, again speeding up performance.
Minimum face size:
This could help if you're mainly looking for people in the foreground and help reduce false positives.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm anonymising long interview videos and so the time is limiting.
To improve this could you just use tracking, like is used in other object detection situations where you perform detection periodically and then tracking in the intermediate frames.
This should help in a couple of different ways:
Other optimisations
Number of expected faces:
could include a parameter for the number of faces in the image. If you're just expecting 2-3 then as long as the track is good on those then you can have less frequent detection, again speeding up performance.
Minimum face size:
This could help if you're mainly looking for people in the foreground and help reduce false positives.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: