Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup a (data-privacy friendly) analytics service #32

Closed
Tirokk opened this issue Oct 4, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Setup a (data-privacy friendly) analytics service #32

Tirokk opened this issue Oct 4, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@Tirokk
Copy link
Member

Tirokk commented Oct 4, 2020

appinteractive Authored by appinteractive
Sep 22, 2018
Closed Feb 18, 2020


We want to get some statistics without using external services. Therefore we need a working matomo docker compose with all needed services to run inside conditioners so we can deploy it.

https://matomo.org/

Edit:
As @datenbrei mentions below we could use https://usefathom.com/ instead.

@Tirokk
Copy link
Member Author

Tirokk commented Oct 6, 2020

realB12 Authored by realB12
Sep 22, 2018


Is there an overall plan and proper evaluation process that is putting this into context? Why analytic? What kind of analytics and most important: what are the concrete actions and benefits out of this?
Are we 100% clear about what we need - now and in the future - that we have all the stable requirements that make Matomo the only possible and never changing option everybody is and will be happy with in the future. Who decides all this?

@Tirokk
Copy link
Member Author

Tirokk commented Oct 6, 2020

appinteractive Authored by appinteractive
Sep 22, 2018


It’s the least intrusive way to get deeper insights to what works, what doesn’t and how we can improve the platform in the future. You will be able to opt out of it so you will not have to participate in helping with your anonymous data. It’s a tool for improvement. It was discussed internally multiple times and is by our knowledge the best option for maintaining data privacy. Any other suggestion for a modern, self hosted, open source analytics that is not selling your privacy? If so, please share it with us.

I don’t want to make It a multi decade standardization process like the w3c does it and we do not need to. It’s important to iterate fast (as it also costs money) so we all can use this tool here sooner then later and improve it. Don’t agree? Fork, host and maintain it for your self. It’s MIT.

@Tirokk
Copy link
Member Author

Tirokk commented Oct 6, 2020

datenbrei Authored by datenbrei
Mar 27, 2019


Still needed now that we have Fathom?

@Tirokk
Copy link
Member Author

Tirokk commented Oct 7, 2020

stale[bot] Authored by stale[bot]
Nov 19, 2019


This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@Tirokk
Copy link
Member Author

Tirokk commented Oct 7, 2020

mattwr18 Authored by mattwr18
Nov 20, 2019


still relevant? I didn't know we have Fathom... are we collecting analytics already? there is no opt-out from the user perspective, as far as I know, if we are already collecting anonymous data...
can you clarify this @datenbrei? It still seems like something that would be good to implement, no?

@Tirokk
Copy link
Member Author

Tirokk commented Oct 7, 2020

stale[bot] Authored by stale[bot]
Jan 19, 2020


This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@Mogge Mogge closed this as completed Oct 8, 2020
ulfgebhardt pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2023
…emplates-for-terms-and-conditions-etc

chore: 🍰 Add Branding Templates For Terms And Conditions Etc.
ulfgebhardt added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2024
chore(workflow): dependabot support
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants