You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Processes aggregate_spatial, filter_spatial, mask_polygon have a geometries (or mask) parameter that currently is of type geojson:object. Likewise, load_collection and load_result have a spatial_extent parameter that can be geojson:object (among other options).
Once we improve support for loading/processing vector cubes (e.g. #322) these processes should also allow vector-cube as data type for these parameters,
so that a user can pass the geometries with a file/url instead of embedding geojson in the process graph
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
soxofaan
changed the title
Vector cube usage in aggregate_spatial, filter_spatial, mask_polygon
Vector cube usage in aggregate_spatial, filter_spatial, mask_polygon, ...
Feb 15, 2022
Allowing aggregate_spatial to get vector-cube as input is necessary to proceed with the random_forest pipeline. In the meanwhile I will modify the process locally for some tests.
I'm not sure I'd add vector-cube as input for load_result and load_collection. These are compromises of simplicity and utility.
You may then just add it to filter_spatial as a dedicated process that can be used to filter based on vector cubes.
Processes
aggregate_spatial
,filter_spatial
,mask_polygon
have ageometries
(ormask
) parameter that currently is of typegeojson:object
. Likewise,load_collection
andload_result
have aspatial_extent
parameter that can begeojson:object
(among other options).Once we improve support for loading/processing vector cubes (e.g. #322) these processes should also allow
vector-cube
as data type for these parameters,so that a user can pass the geometries with a file/url instead of embedding geojson in the process graph
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: