-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix:slave_prorority need to be 100 when used redis sentinel #2813
Conversation
WalkthroughThe primary change involved modifying the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- include/pika_conf.h (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
include/pika_conf.h (1)
894-894
: LGTM! But verify the impact of the newslave_priority_
value.The change from
0
to100
forslave_priority_
is straightforward and looks good. However, ensure that this new value aligns with the intended behavior of the system and does not introduce any unintended consequences.To verify, check for any dependencies or assumptions in the codebase that rely on the old value.
Verification successful
LGTM! But verify the impact of the new
slave_priority_
value.The change from
0
to100
forslave_priority_
is straightforward and looks good. However, ensure that this new value aligns with the intended behavior of the system and does not introduce any unintended consequences.
- The
slave_priority_
variable is read and set in several places within the codebase.- There are no specific comments or documentation indicating assumptions about its value.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the new `slave_priority_` value. # Test: Search for the usage of `slave_priority_` in the codebase. Expect: No assumptions on the old value. rg --type cpp -A 5 $'slave_priority_'Length of output: 1663
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather detailed information on the usage of `slave_priority_` in the codebase. # Search for the usage of `slave_priority_` in the codebase with more context. rg --type cpp -A 10 -B 10 $'slave_priority_'Length of output: 5892
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any documentation or comments related to `slave_priority_` to understand its intended usage. # Search for any comments or documentation mentioning `slave_priority_`. rg --type cpp -A 5 -B 5 'slave_priority_'Length of output: 3054
Co-authored-by: chejinge <chejinge@360.cn>
…Foundation#2813) Co-authored-by: chejinge <chejinge@360.cn>
…Foundation#2813) Co-authored-by: chejinge <chejinge@360.cn>
#2793
Summary by CodeRabbit