Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Question about evaluation code #29

Closed
sugar-fly opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Question about evaluation code #29

sugar-fly opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@sugar-fly
Copy link

Hi,

Is there any difference between the evaluation code provided by this repository and the one actually used in the paper?
Because I found that there is a large gap between the TOP_lsls in the paper and this repository.

best,
@sephyli
Copy link
Collaborator

sephyli commented Apr 22, 2024

The OpenLane-V2 evaluation kit has been updated to address a loophole in the TOP metric. This update was made after the LaneSegNet submission. Please refer to #76 for more details.

@sugar-fly
Copy link
Author

sugar-fly commented Apr 22, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Btw, if there are any plans to share the performance of LaneSegNet on the Map Element Bucket? @sephyli

@sephyli
Copy link
Collaborator

sephyli commented Apr 22, 2024

I just find a similar issue #26. I will have a test and provide the performance in that issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sephyli @sugar-fly