We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Usually I expect a Generator to have __iter__ defined, but the pattern used seems a lot closer to a factory pattern.
__iter__
Would it make sense to not call it "Generator" to avoid Python confusion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In conversation with @RiesBen, we think that Creator might be a more accurate term. But there is a code example in the paper draft using Generator.
Creator
Generator
@IAlibay we are find with making this Generator -> Creator name change quickly before publishing. Any concerns?
Sorry, something went wrong.
In conversation with @RiesBen, we think that Creator might be a more accurate term. But there is a code example in the paper draft using Generator. @IAlibay we are find with making this Generator -> Creator name change quickly before publishing. Any concerns?
After discussions, this is might be an interesting suggestion for the future. For now we will not follow up on this.
No branches or pull requests
Usually I expect a Generator to have
__iter__
defined, but the pattern used seems a lot closer to a factory pattern.Would it make sense to not call it "Generator" to avoid Python confusion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: