Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Security Token implementation #1322

Closed
1 task done
darioAnongba opened this issue Sep 12, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed
1 task done

Security Token implementation #1322

darioAnongba opened this issue Sep 12, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@darioAnongba
Copy link

darioAnongba commented Sep 12, 2018

🎉 Description

Hi everyone,

Currently, we are interested in implementing a security token and know that this is something that interests most people in the space. That's why we thought that the implementation could be done with OpenZeppelin in order to achieve a higher degree of security and reviews.

  • 📈 This is a feature request.

📝 Details

The ERC1400 proposal seems like a good place to start: ethereum/EIPs#1400
The EIP is not in last call but both definition and development could be done in parallel. Security tokens being a necessity, we will have to create a standard someday anyways.

Implementing a non-standard security token would be a disaster as it won't be interoperable with others and wouldn't be integrated in exchanges, explorers, etc. All those that need to implement a security token are welcome to collaborate on this.

👍 Other Information

[TO BE ADDED]

@MichalZalecki
Copy link

MichalZalecki commented Oct 29, 2018

@darioAnongba Here's the reference implementation I'm happy to collaborate and help!

@jfpalngipang
Copy link

I would be happy to collaborate on this. Count me in!

@MichalZalecki
Copy link

I'm working on the implementation that is more compliant with the draft ERC and will share it here.

@darioAnongba
Copy link
Author

Thanks @MichalZalecki !

@jochenonline
Copy link
Contributor

Any news about this topic?

@MichalZalecki
Copy link

@frangio
Copy link
Contributor

frangio commented Feb 14, 2022

We don't see sufficient interest in this area to justify working on it at the moment. Feel free to show support in this issue so we can reconsider it in the future.

@frangio frangio closed this as completed Feb 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants