You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the OZ Governance system, these parameters are never implemented concretely, but instead exist as virtual parameters. (Unless, of course, I'm missing something!).
The expectation is, presumably, that each project will implement these parameters on their own concrete instance and set them to whichever values they prefer. It would also be possible for said implementer to also create setters for these parameters with appropriate logic around who can set them.
In order to offer out-of-the box feature parity with Bravo, we propose the following course of action:
Implement a concrete Governor instance that:
Takes values for the three governance parameters as arguments in its constructor
Does basic validation of the parameters in both the constructor and setter methods
We are happy to take a first pass at this feature and open a PR if it is something the OZ team would be willing to merge if implemented. Thanks for your consideration!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
🧐 Motivation
Feature parity with Compound Governor Bravo.
📝 Details
In Compound's Governor Bravo, it's possible for Governance itself to update the following governance parameters:
In the OZ Governance system, these parameters are never implemented concretely, but instead exist as virtual parameters. (Unless, of course, I'm missing something!).
The expectation is, presumably, that each project will implement these parameters on their own concrete instance and set them to whichever values they prefer. It would also be possible for said implementer to also create setters for these parameters with appropriate logic around who can set them.
In order to offer out-of-the box feature parity with Bravo, we propose the following course of action:
Implement a concrete Governor instance that:
We are happy to take a first pass at this feature and open a PR if it is something the OZ team would be willing to merge if implemented. Thanks for your consideration!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: