Impact
The GovernorCompatibilityBravo
module may lead to the creation of governance proposals that execute function calls with incorrect arguments due to bad ABI encoding. This happens if the proposal is created using explicit function signatures, e.g. a proposal to invoke the function foo(uint256)
is created as propose([target], [0], ["foo(uint256)"], ["0x00..01"])
. If the function selector is provided as part of the encoded proposal data the issue is not present, e.g. the same proposal is created as propose([target], [0], ["0x2fbebd3800..01"])
, where 2fbebd38
is the function selector.
We've assessed the instances of this contract found on chain, and did not find any occurrence of this bug in the past. Proposal creation through Tally or OpenZeppelin Defender is not affected. The core Governor
contract on its own is not affected.
Patches
A fix is included in version v4.4.2 of @openzeppelin/contracts
and @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable
.
Workarounds
Do not create proposals using explicit function signatures. Instead, use the propose
function without the signatures
argument, and create the proposal using the fully ABI-encoded function call including the function selector in the calldatas
argument as explained above.
References
#3099
Credits
This issue was identified and reported by @GeraldHost.
For more information
If you have any questions, comments, or need assistance regarding this advisory, email us at security@openzeppelin.com.
To submit security reports please use our bug bounty on Immunefi.
Impact
The
GovernorCompatibilityBravo
module may lead to the creation of governance proposals that execute function calls with incorrect arguments due to bad ABI encoding. This happens if the proposal is created using explicit function signatures, e.g. a proposal to invoke the functionfoo(uint256)
is created aspropose([target], [0], ["foo(uint256)"], ["0x00..01"])
. If the function selector is provided as part of the encoded proposal data the issue is not present, e.g. the same proposal is created aspropose([target], [0], ["0x2fbebd3800..01"])
, where2fbebd38
is the function selector.We've assessed the instances of this contract found on chain, and did not find any occurrence of this bug in the past. Proposal creation through Tally or OpenZeppelin Defender is not affected. The core
Governor
contract on its own is not affected.Patches
A fix is included in version v4.4.2 of
@openzeppelin/contracts
and@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable
.Workarounds
Do not create proposals using explicit function signatures. Instead, use the
propose
function without thesignatures
argument, and create the proposal using the fully ABI-encoded function call including the function selector in thecalldatas
argument as explained above.References
#3099
Credits
This issue was identified and reported by @GeraldHost.
For more information
If you have any questions, comments, or need assistance regarding this advisory, email us at security@openzeppelin.com.
To submit security reports please use our bug bounty on Immunefi.