Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I found that it's most useful for documentation changes (most possibly its training data including a lot of English text and also Markdown). For code changes, only occasionally and mostly it's noise. I side effect of the bot's comments is that in the PR list it'll show also those PRs as having comments that still need a person's review, making it harder to distinguish. This can be improved with an automatically managed tag though. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It is going to take a little more time for me to say. So far, I'd say that the 🐰 didn't do much else than doing a summary text of the PR. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As part of #15439, we had automatic AI code reviews with CodeRabbit for all PRs in the last week. After our experiences, it's time to decide how to move forward. If you've interacted with the CodeRabbit review bot, please vote below, and add comments as well!
Note that you can use various commands with the bot, as well as there are config options to tune it to what we need (what I started under #15813).
5 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions