Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential compatibility with create to prevent item loss/dupes #340

Open
Hophenby opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Potential compatibility with create to prevent item loss/dupes #340

Hophenby opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Hophenby
Copy link

to reproduce this bug:
step 1 apply compression upgrade to the container and add some item like this:
image

step 2 attach this container to a Create contraption
image

step 3 open the barrel on the contraption and take the item inside
image

step 4 disassemble the contraption and repeat the steps above

Create mod version 0.5.1e
Sophisticated Storage version 0.8.51.605

@P3pp3rF1y
Copy link
Owner

Yup, sure that will require a proper compatibility for create which is not possible at the moment. Not really a bug I can fix on my side because create in general makes assumptions about storages it's connecting and so it assumes a dummy storage and just copies the stacks over. Without compatibility support and proper compatibility implemented the only "fix" at the moment is banning sophisticated storage from being attachable to create using create configs if such thing exists.

I would like to see if create team is open to adding compatibility support so that I could add compatibility on my side. Thus I will leave this open for possible future compat.

@P3pp3rF1y P3pp3rF1y added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 30, 2024
@P3pp3rF1y P3pp3rF1y changed the title Item dupe with Create contraption Potential compatibility with create to prevent item loss/dupes Jan 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants