Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow to replace replacement (for recursive grammars data) #337

Open
mvorisek opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Allow to replace replacement (for recursive grammars data) #337

mvorisek opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mvorisek
Copy link

This is a feature request to allow to replace replacement, ie. to restart replace after next character of the match instead of the next character after the match.

Currently, recursive regexes must be manually restarted to match inner matches which imply some unneeded CPU overhead, especially in non-compiled programming languages.

I propose a new PCRE flag which will force the PCRE engine replace process to continue at +1 character instead of +N characters (where N is number of matched characters).

@PhilipHazel PhilipHazel added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 15, 2023
@PhilipHazel
Copy link
Collaborator

I have just had a look at this, and what you suggest is not something that can easily be done because the code works by creating its output in a different buffer. When the global option is set, the scan continues in the old (input) buffer. I think you could implement what you want externally fairly efficiently by having two buffers. Start with buffer 1 holding the input, call pcre2_match(), remember the offset where it matched, call pcre2_substitute() with your match_data block and PCRE2_SUBSTITUTE_MATCHED but NOT the global option, and buffer 2 as the output. Start the next call to pcre2_match() with buffer 2 as the input and the appropriate offset and buffer 1 as the output. And so on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants