Throat length vs Direct vs Total throat lenght #2684
Unanswered
JorgeESantos
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
@JorgeESantos Hello. Could you share the example of your code with me? I try to create my own, but all the time i am confused with the old examples of syntax and functionality from the previous 2.8 release on the website, so i have a weak understanding of how we should follow the process and how the functions look like. The working example will help me a lot |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Greetings.
I've been making some Stokes simulations on Networks generated with Snow over 3D Binary images and, in the process of tunning my Network to understand how different parameters affect the obtained permeability, I noticed something that I cannot clarify by myself.
Assuming that I am treating my Network pores and throat as "Spheres and Cylinders", the throat.length value to be used in the hydraulic size factors calculation can be achieved by:
Net.add_model(propname='throat.length', model=pnm.models.geometry.throat_length.spheres_and_cylinders)
This value is the same obtained by the method:
Net.add_model(propname='conduits_lenght', model=pnm.models.geometry.conduit_lengths.spheres_and_cylinders)
My question is regarding how is this value calculated, since the available links to the respective scripts do not provide any helpful information. Moreover, and more importantly, why are the obtained values for throat.lenghts or conduit.lenghts, achieved by these models, so different from the ones labeled as "throat.direct_lenght" and "throat.total_lenght"??
https://openpnm.org/_modules/openpnm/models/geometry/conduit_lengths/_funcs.html#spheres_and_cylinders
Best regards, Jorge E. Santos.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions