Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any reason for dual softmax matcher for inference? #18

Open
ducha-aiki opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Any reason for dual softmax matcher for inference? #18

ducha-aiki opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ducha-aiki
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

I am wondering, can we just use mutual nearest neighbor matching for speed at inference time? Dual softmax normalizes the scores, but doesn't change the actual neighbors (matches).

@Parskatt
Copy link
Owner

We have a confidence threshold for the matches based on the ds scores. If you remove that youll get more outliers.

Otherwise yes, I see no major issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants