Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kills performance on my machine #158

Open
Pauan opened this issue Aug 1, 2015 · 11 comments
Open

Kills performance on my machine #158

Pauan opened this issue Aug 1, 2015 · 11 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

Originally reported on Google Code with ID 159

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Enable the extension
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I enable the extension and my system virtually freezes. It looks like this is due to
almost continuous disk access. I disable the extension and it goes back to normal.


What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
4.3; Window 7 64-bit

Please provide any additional information below.

Reported by rjplummersb on 2012-05-15 17:40:15

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

That's really really weird. I've never seen, heard of, or experienced this. Could you
try opening up the Task Manager (Shift+Escape) and post a screenshot of the Tab Organizer
process?

Reported by pcxunlimited on 2012-05-18 07:19:47

  • Status changed: Delegated
  • Labels added: Priority-Critical, Performance
  • Labels removed: Priority-Medium

@Pauan Pauan self-assigned this Aug 1, 2015
@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

I just thought of something. How many bookmarks/tabs do you have?

Tab Organizer accesses all your bookmarks on startup so that "is:bookmark" can work
correctly (it only cares about the URLs and doesn't use the information for anything
other than "is:bookmark", and it doesn't save the information in any way, which is
why it has to retrieve all the bookmarks every time it starts up)

If you had a LOT of bookmarks (many thousands) or a slow disk, then that could be the
cause of the problem.

The version 5 rewrite will be trying something different, so this shouldn't be a problem
anymore. Unless using IndexedDB ends up causing the same poor-performance IO.

Reported by pcxunlimited on 2012-08-27 22:37:08

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

Reported by pcxunlimited on 2012-08-27 23:04:23

  • Labels added: Type-External
  • Labels removed: Type-Bug

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

Reported by pcxunlimited on 2012-08-27 23:15:12

  • Labels removed: Performance

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

Reported by pcxunlimited on 2012-08-27 23:17:41

  • Labels removed: OS-All

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

Reported by pcxunlimited on 2012-08-27 23:32:45

  • Labels added: Type-Visible
  • Labels removed: Type-External

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

Reported by pcxunlimited on 2012-08-27 23:36:10

  • Labels added: Type-Confirmed
  • Labels removed: Type-Visible

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

Reported by pcxunlimited on 2012-08-27 23:39:19

  • Labels removed: Priority-Critical

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

Reported by pcxunlimited on 2012-08-27 23:47:28

  • Status changed: Assigned

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

I probably have a 1000 bookmarks. I moved to an SSD and haven't had the problem since
so perhaps it was the combination of bookmarks and slow HD

Reported by rjplummersb on 2012-08-28 03:27:38

@Pauan
Copy link
Owner Author

Pauan commented Aug 1, 2015

Great to hear that you haven't had any problems since then. But 1,000 bookmarks really
isn't that many, considering I have 10,000+ without any problems.

Reported by pcxunlimited on 2012-08-28 05:40:28

  • Status changed: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant