You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Need to document differences between aslprep.workflows.asl.util.init_enhance_and_skullstrip_asl_wf and niworkflows.func.util.init_enhance_and_skullstrip_bold_wf.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There was an image dilation step applied to the input image, then a header-check to make sure the dilation step didn't mess up the header.
There was a pre_mask bool parameter for when the mask was vs. was not already calculated. The "mask was not pre-generated" logic has been removed, even though the parameter remains.
However, in the current version of sdcflows, init_enhance_and_skullstrip_bold_wf is only used for the PEPOLAR workflow, which shouldn't apply to ASL data. I think this means that we can switch to the newer version of sdcflows and not need the modified version of init_enhance_and_skullstrip_bold_wf we currently have.
Summary
Need to document differences between
aslprep.workflows.asl.util.init_enhance_and_skullstrip_asl_wf
andniworkflows.func.util.init_enhance_and_skullstrip_bold_wf
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: