Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use closed-world assumption for simple refinement types #644

Closed
bvssvni opened this issue Sep 18, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

Use closed-world assumption for simple refinement types #644

bvssvni opened this issue Sep 18, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@bvssvni
Copy link
Member

bvssvni commented Sep 18, 2019

Alternative to #642

Instead of reporting an error explicitly with a special refinement type, one can assume that all refinement types are listed. If the type checker does not detect any ambiguity, yet a type does not match any refinement, an error is reported.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant