Bot Print "This is a VIP pokemon. Catch!!!" even low stat pokemon.

[razithekillers]

Expected Behavior

IV below 0.8 Should not VIPs

Actual Behavior

All pokemon catching is stated VIPs

Your FULL config.json (remove your username, password, gmapkey and any other private info)

http://pastebin.com/kFwE76zv

Output when issue occurred

Steps to Reproduce

Should not print "This is a VIP pokemon. Catch!!!" If IV below 0.8

Other Information

OS:
Ubuntu On Windows
Branch:
Master
Git Commit:

Python Version:

Any other relevant files/configs (eg: path files)

Short Description

Possible solution

How it would help others

[Bashin]

"treat_unseen_as_vip": true,
in your config.. set this to false

[razithekillers]

@Bashin Thanks, :D

[kenkclam]

I have the same problem:

2016-08-24 11:17:44,589 [PokemonCatchWorker] [INFO] [pokemon_appeared] A wild Poliwag appeared! [CP 10] [NCP 0.01] [Potential 0.58] [A/D/S 7/11/8]
2016-08-24 11:17:47,591 [PokemonCatchWorker] [INFO] [vip_pokemon] This is a VIP pokemon. Catch!!!
2016-08-24 11:17:50,377 [PokemonCatchWorker] [INFO] [threw_pokeball] OK throw! Used Pokeball, with chance 100.00 (85 left)
2016-08-24 11:17:50,598 [PokemonCatchWorker] [INFO] [pokemon_caught] Captured Poliwag! [CP 10] [NCP 0.01] [Potential 0.58] [7/11/8] [+100 exp]

As you can see, poliwag is not an unseen pokemon [+100 exp] not [+600 exp]
the bot still define it as VIP

maybe if the pokemon has higher cp/iv than what I have in the bag, the bot will call it VIP?
I have not found such a setting in the config file wiki page.

[maxprzemo]

@kenkclam
read what he wrote @Bashin

• treat_unseen_as_vip: Default "true" | Set to "false" to disable treating pokemons you don't have in your pokedex as VIPs.

[davidspeijer]

Could it be that;
bot starts and capture first Poliwag but doesn't update the captured pokemon? So next time it sees a Poliwag without a restart that it is still treaded as a VIP?

[sohje]

@kenkclam Show us your config.
@davidspeijer Just started a new bot. First Rattata treated as VIP, second one - as normal pokemon. So pokedex updated correctly. Same for Pidgeys.

[k4n30]

@Calcyfer - Can you look into please as this was your PR

[glennvgastel]

@k4n30 My PR only added the config value, the actual logic was added by @sohje in PR #4580 .
The config value seems to work, so I'd look into the logic direction.

[sohje]

@Calcyfer @k4n30 I made tests before and review code - dont see any problems with logic or code.
Need more logs and bots configs where problem accurs.

[glennvgastel]

@kenkclam A small reminder to show us your config, please.

[mjmadsen]

Since @razithekillers issue has been solved, please open up a new issue if you have problems (with configs and logs!)