Solidity support revisited revisited #2031
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mAAdhaTTah
reviewed
Sep 2, 2019
mAAdhaTTah
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2019
|
@davidmurdoch When will you be tagging a version including solidity.min.js and pushing to unpkg.com? |
|
We have 3 PRs slated for the next release, so whenever those are in, we'll cut the next one. |
|
Cool. I'm just serving a local copy for now. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I completely rewrote the Solidity language. It now uses C like as a base because it's less likely to change compared to JS and because JS contains a lot of features which Solidity doesn't.
I also added a few tests.
Example
This closes #1843 and resolves #1404.