Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for SimpleITK #327

Closed
kiranvaidhya opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Support for SimpleITK #327

kiranvaidhya opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request working group needs working group discussions

Comments

@kiranvaidhya
Copy link

I'm trying to run the example files on a local dataset made of .mha files. I could convert them into Nifti files but SimpleITK is a nicely built library and is capable of handling different medical imaging formats.

Is there a plan to incorporate SimpleITK into this project?

@Nic-Ma
Copy link
Contributor

Nic-Ma commented Apr 30, 2020

Hi @kiranvaidhya ,

Thanks very much for your interest!
We already have an issue #135 that add SimpleITK related things for DICOM images.
Thanks.

@aylward
Copy link
Collaborator

aylward commented Apr 30, 2020

Perhaps consider ITK Python. It is a recent development that is directly derived from ITK. ITK Python provides direct support for numpy arrays, xarrays, and other data formats. It also exposes more of ITK and is more "pythonic" than SimpleITK. It also exposes recent developments in GDCM for DICOM I/O. See ITK Python Quick Start

@pdogra89 pdogra89 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 15, 2020
@wyli wyli added the working group needs working group discussions label May 15, 2020
@wyli
Copy link
Contributor

wyli commented Jun 18, 2020

I'm closing this in favor of #589

@wyli wyli closed this as completed Jun 18, 2020
@jond01 jond01 mentioned this issue Jul 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request working group needs working group discussions
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants