Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make new server for Blackhawk Hills region in Chicago #3731

Closed
misaugstad opened this issue Nov 9, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3749
Closed

Make new server for Blackhawk Hills region in Chicago #3731

misaugstad opened this issue Nov 9, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3749
Assignees

Comments

@misaugstad
Copy link
Member

Brief description of problem/feature

Copied from an email thread with @yeisenberg:

Introducing you to ... a planner for Blackhawk Hills Regional Council. We met today and they are ready to move forward with Project Sidewalk. ... They have a grant that will engage a steering committee and residents in each of 6 communities. Some are smaller than others. Here is a list. My thought was to put together into one deployment called ‘Blackhawk Hills Region’ and then treat each city as a ‘neighborhood’

Village of Ridott in Stephenson County - pop. 124
Village of Dakota in Stephenson County - pop. 500
Village of Orangeville in Stephenson County - pop. 766
City of Savanna in Carroll County - pop. 2783
Village of Elizabeth in Jo Daviess County - pop. 694
City of Galena in Jo Daviess County - pop. 3308

Here's the attached boundary data for these areas:
Walkability Studies.zip

Each area looks pretty small, so probably one "neighborhood" per village/city will suffice. But may end up splitting up one or both of the cities a bit once I actually get to working on it.

@misaugstad
Copy link
Member Author

And they have a training planned for December, so the goal is to have this ready by the end of November.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: done / on test servers
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant