-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ex43.3.jl #10
Comments
Interesting, that definitely is a bug. I guess this might be because of recent changes in sparse matrice? I'll have a look. |
I've made a whole bunch of updates, all to do with changes in sparse matrices, DataFrames, etc. |
No luck yet, but I think the problem is the dimensions of the stiffness matrix. Above minor updates will part of v1.1.0 (did not allow me to do it in a patch release). This issue hopefully in an upcoming v1.1.1. |
The problem with Ex43.3.jl was that this problem was not correct as p43 only supports bending. I attempted to add this example many years ago to check an aspect of a directional drilling application (in the Github organization BottomHoleAssemblyAnalysis) and subsequently switched to Frames (as in the Nodal Formulas examples). I should have removed the example then. I fixed another issue in p43 which caused the forces and moments not to correspond to the book. Not sure at what point I introduced that bug. Just now a new version has been merged, v1.1.1. |
In Ex43.3.jl:
ERROR: LoadError: BoundsError: attempt to access 4×4 Array{Float64,2} at index [5, 4]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: