-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvements in Test Coverage #254
Comments
Current Coverage Statistics:
|
Closing this Issue. I will open specific Issues highlighting areas with less than 80% coverage. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Taking a closer look at the coverage statistics there are a few tests that we could include that would quickly improve the overall statistic. An example from
quantecon/arma.py
is:Are there any opinions in the group re: writing tests for these cases where the result is a simple string formatting exercise and doesn't really incorporate any tests of logic? My feeling is that writing tests for these cases offers protect against potential changes down the line in Python syntax between version changes to string formatting (as an example).
Complete coverage statistics are as follows:
If anyone submits a PR addressing some of these "missing" lines can you please reference this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: