Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 18, 2021. It is now read-only.

Use expv_timestep instead of expv for TE #48

Open
Roger-luo opened this issue Jun 3, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Use expv_timestep instead of expv for TE #48

Roger-luo opened this issue Jun 3, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Roger-luo
Copy link
Member

expv_timestep converge faster in Lancoz because it divide the total time step into small steps and re-use the Krylov space, as suggested by @ChrisRackauckas we should try this for our time evolution.

And we need to investigate the in-place exp SciML/ExponentialUtilities.jl#20 in upstream.
@Roger-luo Roger-luo added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 3, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Roger-luo