You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The paper, Fast Erasure Decoder for Hypergraph Product Codes, introduces several specific decoders for quantum LDPC codes. Specifically, It presents an efficient decoder aimed at correcting 'erasures' or 'detectable qubit loss' in hypergraph product (HGP) codes. By treating erased qubits as uniformly random mixed states, it transform the erasure correction problem into one of error correction. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the proposed Pruned Peeling + VH decoder achieves a logical error rate comparable to the maximum likelihood (ML) decoder, with a probabilistic variant operating in O($N^{1.5}$) bit operations, where $N$ is the code length.
Describe the solution you’d like
The aforementioned paper provides the algorithmic implementations of the first four decoders and compares the performance of these decoders with Maximum Likelihood (ML) decoder (see Fig 4). Overall, the following specific decoders for quantum LDPC codes are highlighted in the paper:
The numerical simulations demonstrate that Pruned Peeling + VH decoder offers near-optimal performance and can be implemented with O($N^2$) complexity. This decoder can also serve as a subroutine to enhance decoders like the BP-OSD decoder, Union-Find decoder, or Viderman's decoder.
Describe alternatives you’ve considered
To be added soon.
Additional context
A closely related paper, Toward a Union-Find decoder for quantum LDPC codes provides algorithmic implementation of UF decoder for quantum LDPC codes (Algorithm 1, page 9). The performance of this generalized version of UF decoder for quantum LDPC codes is compared with Belief Propagation (BP) decoder. Notably, the paper demonstrates that the decoder reliably corrects errors up to a certain weight for various quantum LDPC codes, including toric, hyperbolic, and quantum expander codes in dimensions $D ≥ 3$. Also, it notes that both the Renormalization Group (RG) decoder and decoders based on local rules are impractical/unfeasible, leading the authors to propose the generalized UF decoder for quantum LDPC codes as a more feasible solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The paper, Fast Erasure Decoder for Hypergraph Product Codes, introduces several specific decoders for quantum LDPC codes. Specifically, It presents an efficient decoder aimed at correcting 'erasures' or 'detectable qubit loss' in hypergraph product (HGP) codes. By treating erased qubits as uniformly random mixed states, it transform the erasure correction problem into one of error correction. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the proposed Pruned Peeling + VH decoder achieves a logical error rate comparable to the maximum likelihood (ML) decoder, with a probabilistic variant operating in O($N^{1.5}$ ) bit operations, where $N$ is the code length.
Describe the solution you’d like
The aforementioned paper provides the algorithmic implementations of the first four decoders and compares the performance of these decoders with Maximum Likelihood (ML) decoder (see Fig 4). Overall, the following specific decoders for quantum LDPC codes are highlighted in the paper:
(Algorithm 1)
(Algorithm 2)
(Algorithm 3)
In addition, the python implementation of the Pruned Peeling and VH decoder is also provided by the paper here: https://github.com/Nicholas-Connolly/Pruned-Peeling-and-VH-Decoder
The numerical simulations demonstrate that Pruned Peeling + VH decoder offers near-optimal performance and can be implemented with O($N^2$ ) complexity. This decoder can also serve as a subroutine to enhance decoders like the BP-OSD decoder, Union-Find decoder, or Viderman's decoder.
Describe alternatives you’ve considered
To be added soon.
Additional context
A closely related paper, Toward a Union-Find decoder for quantum LDPC codes provides algorithmic implementation of UF decoder for quantum LDPC codes$D ≥ 3$ . Also, it notes that both the Renormalization Group (RG) decoder and decoders based on local rules are impractical/unfeasible, leading the authors to propose the generalized UF decoder for quantum LDPC codes as a more feasible solution.
(Algorithm 1, page 9)
. The performance of this generalized version of UF decoder for quantum LDPC codes is compared with Belief Propagation (BP) decoder. Notably, the paper demonstrates that the decoder reliably corrects errors up to a certain weight for various quantum LDPC codes, including toric, hyperbolic, and quantum expander codes in dimensionsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: