You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a simple simulation of a mini circuits power splitter. You would expect there to be some small insertion loss between port 1 and ports 2&3 as well as a slight phase shift. However, the simulation in QUCS appears to simulate an ideal splitter with no phase shifting or loss of voltage amplitude - the output voltages are literally on top of the input. You can see these effects though in the corresponding Keysight ADS simulation though. The other odd thing is how the S parameter will not work unless the parameter duringDC is set to short when this device is a transformer and at DC it's really an open. Otherwise great program, I hope IBIS simulation capability is on the roadmap.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a simple simulation of a mini circuits power splitter. You would expect there to be some small insertion loss between port 1 and ports 2&3 as well as a slight phase shift. However, the simulation in QUCS appears to simulate an ideal splitter with no phase shifting or loss of voltage amplitude - the output voltages are literally on top of the input. You can see these effects though in the corresponding Keysight ADS simulation though. The other odd thing is how the S parameter will not work unless the parameter duringDC is set to short when this device is a transformer and at DC it's really an open. Otherwise great program, I hope IBIS simulation capability is on the roadmap.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: