You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, Omniperf requires the user set export ROCPROF=rocprofv2 to profile on MI300 skews. Per internal conversation with the rocprofiler team, rocprof (v1) has been fully tested and verified for MI300 profiling. I suggest we relax the requirement in Omniperf such that users can profile with rocprof (v1) in addition to rocprofv2.
Describe the solution you'd like
I see the following steps as required:
Make appropriate changes to Omniperf backend. Start with modifying set_compatible_profilers() for each gfx94x child class.
Verify changes on MI300 hardware, ensuring profiling goes smoothly in rocprofv1 environment.
File PR into dev branch
Update documentation PR with a comment instructing @peterjunpark to update core-install.rst accordingly
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, Omniperf requires the user set
export ROCPROF=rocprofv2
to profile on MI300 skews. Per internal conversation with the rocprofiler team, rocprof (v1) has been fully tested and verified for MI300 profiling. I suggest we relax the requirement in Omniperf such that users can profile with rocprof (v1) in addition to rocprofv2.Describe the solution you'd like
I see the following steps as required:
dev
branchcore-install.rst
accordinglyAdditional context
Related GitHub convo to make this change: #362 (comment)
Internal tracking: https://ontrack-internal.amd.com/browse/SWDEV-475098
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: