Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Models can not distinguish explicit and implicit scenarios. #2054

Open
PBlithe opened this issue Jun 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Models can not distinguish explicit and implicit scenarios. #2054

PBlithe opened this issue Jun 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@PBlithe
Copy link

PBlithe commented Jun 2, 2024

Describe the bug
We refer to the setting rules of explicit data in the API document, but we find that the rating value does not affect the final performance index of the model. We tested NeuMF and EASE models respectively, and the Settings were as follows:

field_separator: "\t"
seq_separator: " "
USER_ID_FIELD: user_id
ITEM_ID_FIELD: item_id
RATING_FIELD: rating
NEG_PREFIX: neg_
LABEL_FIELD: label
load_col:
    inter: [user_id, item_id, rating, timestamp]

@PBlithe PBlithe added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants