-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 716
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TS80P reading room temperature too high #1986
Comments
Just to confirm. This does not occur in the previous release IronOS V2.21. I have switched back to this version for now, as PD is also not working anymore in the latest release. |
Have you tried calibrating the device according to this documentation? |
Definitely not a calibration issue. Temperature is reported correctly after switching back to IronOS 2.21 |
I followed these instructions: https://ralim.github.io/IronOS/Menu/#calibrate-tip-cjc And yes, I waited more than 30 minutes and used a cold tip 😊 |
Oh, sorry, I forgot to put in the link to the documentation and missed the part in the initial post that literally states that you already calibrated the iron. 🤦🏻 😅
That's interesting. Maybe your device uses a GD chip instead of a STM one? |
I will check tomorrow which chip is used. Can I find this info in the debug menu or only by looking at the pcb? |
Unfortunately you would need to open the device. |
My TS80P with IronOS 2.22E.C308FE8C reports a room temperature of around 170 degrees Celsius in idle mode.
For reproducing both handle and tips are at room temperature, around 21 degrees C. I have calibrated the iron and tried multiple tips (and power adapters just to make sure), all the same.
Values reported in debug menu are: RTip at ~ 1500 and CHan at ~ 170.
So from my understanding, CHan is the PCB temperature sensor reading in Celsius x 10? Seems reasonable in tolerance.
Reported temperature in idle main menu seems to be exactly the CHan value (without the decimal fraction part). So a CHan value of 170.1 will report tip temperature of 170 degrees celcius.
Since both Rtip and CHan values are in expected range, this must a software bug?
Thanks for looking into it. I really appreciate the work and dedication you put into this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: